| F-20(VMC) Revised Syllabus |
|||
| Time Allowed : 3 Hours | Full Marks : 100 | ||
| Answer Question No. 1 which is compulsory carrying 20 marks and any five from the rest. | |||
| Marks | |||
| 1. | (a) | State whether the following statements are true or false:
|
1x6=6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (b) | Fill in the blanks:
|
1x7=7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (c) | Value creation from existing assets is possible if one could –
|
1x4=4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (d) | Essential for an income approach analysis to evaluate intangible assets are:
|
1x3=3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. | (a) | What are the limitations of Economic Value Added? | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (b) | A company in operation for five years has tangible assets worth Rs.20,00,000. Maintainable future profits are estimated at Rs.4,00,000. The nominal rate of return expected for the company is 15%. It desires to capitalize super profits at 20%. Determine the value of the company. | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (c) | Differentiate between operating and financial synergy. | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. | X and Y are two fast growing companies in the engineering industry. They are close competitors and their composition, capital structure and profitability records have been very similar for several years. The primary difference between the companies from a financial management perspective is their dividend policy. Company X tries to maintain a non-decreasing dividend per share while company Y maintains a constant dividend payment ratio. Their recent earnings per share (EPS), dividend per share (DPS) and share price (P) history are as follows: | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Management of Company “Y” is puzzled as to why their share prices are lower than those of Company x in spite of the fact that profitability record of the company “Y” is slightly better (particularly of past three years).
As a financial consultant, how would you explain the situation? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Please turn over |
( 2 )
| F-20(VMC) Revised syllabus |
Marks |
| 4. | (a) | The price of a company’s share is Rs.80 and the value of growth opportunities is Rs.20. if the company’s capitalization rate is 15 percent, what is the earnings price ratio? How much is earning per share? | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (b) | A company’s current price of share is Rs.60 and dividend per share is Rs.4. if its capitalization rate is 12 percent, what is the dividend growth rate? | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (c) | How is Intellectual Capital Valued? | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (d) | What is the methodology of Brand Valuation? | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5. | (a) | What are the motives and strategies influencing merges and acquisitions? | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (b) | What are the salient features of the Accounting Standard (AS) 13 applicable to corporate regarding valuation of investments? | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6. | The chairman of Rose Ltd. at a board meeting proposed the acquisition of Beauty Ltd.
He stated: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| As a result of this take over we will diversify our operations and our earnings per share will rise by 13 percent, bringing great benefits to out shareholders.
No bid has yet been on a share-for-share exchange, which would be one Rose share for every six Beauty shares. Financial data for the two companies include: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Required:— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | Explain whether you agree with the chairman of Rose when he says that the take over would bring great benefits to out shareholders.
Support your explanation with relevant calculations. State clearly any assumptions that you make. |
12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (b) | On the basis of information provided, calculate the likely post-acquisition share price of Rose if the bid is successful. | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7. | On March 9,2004, Ferguson Systems was trading at Rs.13.62. | 12+4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | To value a July 2004 call option with a strike price of Rs.15, trading on he Board Options Exchange on the same day for Rs.2. The following are the other parameters of the options:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (b) | Comment on the trading value as at 23rd July, 2004. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8. | A strategic approach to takeover would imply that acquisitions are only made after a full analysis of the underlying strengths of the acquirer company and identifications of candidates strategic fit with existing activities. Below are given (A) Possible strategic reasons for a take over and (B) Suggested ways of achieving the aim: | 2x8=16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Required:
Match the numbered items A (1, 2, 3 ……) with the lettered items in B (a, b, c, ...) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| __________ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disclaimer ♣ Privacy Policy ♣ Terms of Service ♣ Who We Are
♣ Copyright © Krishbhavara. All rights reserved
♣ Site optimized for Internet Explorer 5.5 and above

